AI-Powered Psychometric Infrastructure

Western Scales Don't
Measure the World

Over 95% of psychometric instruments were built for WEIRD societies. Isomro transforms them into culturally valid tools — with AI-driven adaptation and full statistical validation.

Same Formula · Different Structure · Mathematically Equivalent · Culturally Valid

The Global Validity Gap

Translation ≠ Adaptation

Translation changes words. Adaptation preserves meaning, structure, and cultural logic. Most organizations still rely on translation alone — producing data that is linguistically correct but psychometrically invalid.

Factor Structures Collapse

Constructs like anxiety, resilience, and motivation may be universal in formula but differ in structure across cultures. Translated scales routinely lose their factor structure.

Items Behave Differently

Differential Item Functioning (DIF) means the same item can measure differently across groups — biasing scores and undermining comparability across countries.

Billions in Silent Failure

Invalid instruments lead to misdiagnosis, biased hiring, failed interventions, and unreliable research — costing billions annually across healthcare, HR, and international development.

"The world's next billion data points will come from the Global South. Without new infrastructure, they will be systematically distorted."

How It Works

Five Steps to Cultural Validity

Upload your scale. Get a culturally adapted, statistically validated instrument — powered by AI agents and a full R statistical engine.

1

Cultural Risk Detection

AI analyzes each item for cultural assumptions — context level, power distance, idioms, and Hofstede-based risk scoring.

2

Linguistic Adaptation

Forward adaptation, reconciliation, and back-translation — preserving meaning while aligning with local communication norms.

3

Structural Equivalence

Expert review and harmonization ensure the construct retains its factor structure, dimensionality, and conceptual boundaries.

4

Psychometric Calibration

CFA, DIF analysis, IRT modeling, and reliability testing via a dedicated R statistical engine — not approximations.

5

Cross-Cultural Validation

Pilot testing confirms configural, metric, and scalar invariance — the gold standard for global measurement equivalence.

Key Capabilities

The Missing Infrastructure for
Global Psychometrics

Not a translation tool. A complete adaptation platform with real statistical validation.

9-Stage AI Pipeline

Multi-agent workflow following ITC Guidelines — from cultural analysis through back-translation to final validation.

R Statistical Engine

Dedicated R microservice running lavaan, psych, mirt, difR, and semTools — real psychometric computation, not LLM approximations.

DIF Analysis

Mantel-Haenszel and logistic regression detect items that function differently across cultural groups, with ETS A/B/C classification.

IRT Modeling

Graded Response and Rasch models provide item-level difficulty, discrimination, and information curves with multiple theta estimation methods.

Invariance Testing

Multi-group CFA tests configural, metric, and scalar invariance — the gold standard for cross-cultural comparability.

Configurable Analysis

Three tiers of settings — from quick defaults to advanced parameters like theta estimation, omega extraction, and custom ETS thresholds.

Use Cases

Where Invalid Data Costs the Most

Clinical Research

Mental Health Screening

Well-being scales referencing "feeling blue" or "losing interest" don't map onto emotional expression norms in Sub-Saharan Africa. Symptom scales lose sensitivity, compromising endpoint reliability.

WHO-5 PHQ-9 GAD-7

Global HR

Talent Assessment

Western personality scales over-penalize collectivist communication patterns, misclassifying candidates as "low initiative" or "low assertiveness" in high-context cultures.

Big Five MBTI 16PF

International Development

Impact Measurement

NGOs measuring resilience, wellbeing, or educational outcomes across countries need scales that produce comparable scores — not translated approximations that mask real differences.

CD-RISC SWLS SDQ

Built For

Anyone Who Measures Human Behavior Across Cultures

Researchers

Cross-cultural studies with validated equivalence

Clinicians

Culturally valid screening and outcome measures

Organizations

Bias-free assessment across global teams

NGOs

Comparable impact metrics across countries

Methodology

Grounded in Established Science

ITC Guidelines

International Test Commission standards for test adaptation

MAPI Methodology

Linguistic validation process used in clinical trials

Hofstede Framework

Cultural dimensions for risk assessment and adaptation

R Ecosystem

lavaan, psych, mirt, difR, semTools — peer-reviewed packages

Pricing

Start Free, Scale When Ready

Free

$0

For exploration and small projects

  • 3 adaptations per month
  • Full 9-stage pipeline
  • Basic pilot report
Get Started
POPULAR

Pro

$49/mo

For active researchers and teams

  • Unlimited adaptations
  • Full statistical reports
  • Advanced analysis settings
  • Multi-format export
Start Pro Trial

Institutional

Custom

Universities, NGOs, and enterprises

  • Volume licensing
  • SSO & team management
  • Dedicated support
  • Custom integrations
Contact Sales

Ready to Close the Validity Gap?

Upload your scale, select a target culture, and get a statistically validated adaptation — in minutes, not months.

Start Adapting Free